Setting a Strategic Context for Bank Risk Management

Publisher: CCG Catalyst

Access this content

Your content has been opened.

Please verify you are a human before downloading this content.

Setting a Strategic Context for Bank Risk Management has been emailed to . Entered the wrong email?

Don't see the content in your inbox?
Make sure to check your spam and other messages folders.

Can't get to your email right now?

To complete your registration and access this content, enter the sign-in code sent to your email.

Please enter a valid verification code.

Code sent to:

Also, remember to check in your spam, promotions, and other folders.

Register to access this content

By accessing content on the Bank Systems & Technology Online Buyer's Guide you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy; and, you acknowledge that your information may be shared with the content publisher.

Setting a Strategic Context for Bank Risk Management

Conventional wisdom has it that banks exist in order to intermediate financial risk. They safeguard the money of depositors, provide the mechanisms for transacting payments reliably and safely, and enable economic growth by lending depositors’ funds to creditworthy borrowers to buy homes, start businesses and create jobs. At least that is the theory. Fundamental to all this activity is the basic assumption that banks know how to manage and minimize the risks that are always involved in financial transactions: borrowers may not pay back, transactions may be fraudulent, markets may swing the wrong way, and human or technological error may otherwise cause losses. Banks are supposed to understand risk, and to have developed sophisticated tools and techniques to protect themselves and their customers from its worst effects. Legislators and regulators issue laws intended to force banks to operate within the confines of “safe and sound” banking practices.